Targeted Therapy Rarely Effective for Primary Tumors in
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
Although the efficacy of targeted therapy for metastatic renal
cell cancer is well established when prior nephrectomy is
performed, research reports on the effectiveness of targeted
therapy for treatment of the primary tumor have largely been
anecdotal. Some case reports, however, have shown a dramatic
response when targeted therapy is used prior to nephrectomy in
bulky primary tumors. Yet the largest study to date of targeted
therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer shows that such dramatic
responses occur very rarely, according to research presented at the
2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in San
Francisco.1
Low Partial Response
Rate
In the study of 143 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer,
only 5.6% had a primary tumor partial response as defined by
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) after a
median follow-up of 1 year. However, 35% of patients experienced
11% to 30% shrinkage of their tumor, and only 7% experienced an
increase in tumor size of greater than 11%.
"Patients with big complex tumors who do not undergo an upfront
cytoreductive nephrectomy may have a meaningful response in the
primary tumor, but it's unlikely to be a dramatic response," said
lead researcher E. Jason Abel, MD, a Clinical Fellow in
Urologic Oncology at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center. "It's important to be realistic about your expectations,"
he added.
Dr. Abel noted that in the study,
patients who did best on targeted therapy experienced an early
response-within the first 90 days. Those who had a greater than 10%
response within the first 90 days, or about one-third of patients,
had a maximum response of 24%. By contrast, patients without an
early response, or about two-thirds of patients, had a maximum
response of only 10%, Dr. Abel said. "If you don't get more than a
10% response in the first 90 days, the chances decrease for having
a dramatic response," Dr. Abel said.
Sunitinib Produced Best Response
In the study, patients were treated with a wide variety of
targeted therapy agents. Those treated with sunitinib (Sutent) had
the best overall response when compared to therapy with other
agents-3 patients on sunitinib experienced a partial response, and
21 showed a 10% to 30% decrease in the size of their tumors. Dr.
Abel noted that if newer-generation targeted therapies were more
active in primary tumors, it would be more promising for
presurgical therapy. Patients who would benefit most from
presurgical therapy would be those who have large tumors, tumors
that are invasive into other organs, or a large volume of
metastatic disease, he added.
"The use of targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell cancer
as a means to shrink the tumor is a hot topic today," commented
Nicholas Vogelzang, MD, Chair and Medical Director of the
Developmental Therapeutics Committee of US Oncology, and Vice Chair
of the genitourinary committee of the Southwest Oncology Group. Dr.
Vogelzang noted that most studies to date show the average
shrinkage in tumor size varies from 12% to 22% in metastatic renal
disease. "The data suggests that these therapies might be helpful
for surgeons. At the same time, we have no prospective randomized
studies that provide data on this approach yet--just level 2
evidence," he noted.
For further information on targeted therapy in metastatic renal
cell carcinoma without cytoreductive nephrectomy, see abstract
4613, being presented June 7 at the ASCO Annual Meeting.
Reference
1. Abel EJ, Tannir NM, Culp SH, et al: Does targeted therapy
result in reliable and meaningful primary tumor downstaging in
patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma? 2010 Genitourinary
Cancers Symposium.
Abstract 318. Presented March 7, 2010.
Barbara Boughton is a freelance reporter based in the San
Francisco area and coauthor of Reduce Your Cancer Risk.