Advertisement

Evidence Grows That Melanoma Drugs May Benefit Some Lung Cancer Patients

Advertisement

Key Points

  • This retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced lung cancer who received the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and sorafenib outside of a clinical trial setting.
  • Patients who received BRAF inhibitor therapy had an overall response rate of 53%, and progression-free survival was 5 months.
  • Further studies are warranted to evaluate combination therapies of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant lung cancer.

A subset of lung cancer patients can derive important clinical benefits from drugs that are more commonly used to treat melanoma, the authors of a new academic clinical trial in Europe have reported at the European Lung Cancer Conference (ELCC) in Geneva (Abstract 21PD_PR).

Oliver Gautschi, MD, a medical oncologist from Lucerne Cantonal Hospital in Switzerland, presented the results of the retrospective EURAF cohort study, which included lung cancer patients whose tumors carried specific mutations in the BRAF gene. The study was conducted by a network of European oncologists, without company involvement.

BRAF mutations are commonly seen in melanoma patients, and are found in about 2% of lung adenocarcinomas, Dr. Gautschi explained. Several inhibitors of the BRAF protein, including vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and dabrafenib (Tafinlar), have been developed for use in melanoma patients, however there is currently no approved drug for BRAF-mutant lung cancer.

As a result, experience with BRAF inhibitors in lung cancer remains limited. “In the current study, we wanted to find out how many patients in Europe received BRAF inhibitors outside of a clinical trial and what their outcomes were,” Dr. Gautschi said.

Study Details

The EURAF study gathered information on 35 lung cancer patients who had been identified as carrying BRAF mutations, who were treated with BRAF inhibitors between 2012 and 2014.

Most of those patients received vemurafenib, some dabrafenib, and one sorafenib (Nexavar). Overall response rate was 53% as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. Overall, progression-free survival time in this group was 5 months.

Most patients were pretreated and not eligible for enrollment in a clinical trial, so these results are encouraging, the researchers said. However they noted that the study’s small size and retrospective nature mean the analysis of the magnitude of benefit should be treated cautiously.

“The bottom line is that clinicians should be sure to test patients for so-called ‘rare’ driver mutations in lung cancer, because individual patients may derive substantial benefit from targeted therapy,” said Dr. Gautschi.

Important Clinical Implications

Commenting on the findings, David Planchard, MD, PhD, pulmonary oncologist at Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France, said that the results of the trial confirm the benefit of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current trial also confirmed the good tolerance of the drugs with no new side effects, he said. Dr. Planchard and colleagues presented a separate phase II study in this area with dabrafenib at the ESMO 2014 Congress.

“This trial is important because due to the low frequency of this mutation in NSCLC we will have few trials on this population,” Dr. Planchard commented. “The more data we have, the better we understand how important it is to test for the mutation, especially in adenocarcinomas, and to expose mutation-positive patients to a specific BRAF inhibitor.”

The results also add to growing support for the approval of BRAF inhibitors for use in lung cancer, Dr. Planchard added. This is important because the rarity of this mutation means that performing the kind of randomized phase III trials usually required for licensing approval will be extremely difficult, he noted.

Looking ahead, it will also be important to see results of combination therapy with inhibitors of BRAF and a related protein, MEK, in BRAF V600E–mutant NSCLC, the researchers note, as this combination has shown a higher clinical benefit in BRAF-mutant melanoma.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement