Advertisement

AACR 2017: Ipilimumab/CVA21 Combination Treatment Shows Promise in Advanced Melanoma

Advertisement

Key Points

  • The overall response rate was 50%, with 4 patients having a complete response and 7 having a partial response.
  • The median duration of response has not been reached, with a number of responses greater than 6 months and several still ongoing.
  • Among the 25 patients evaluable for safety, 2 experienced grade 3 or higher ipilimumab-related adverse events. Thus far, there have been no CVA21-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher. 

Treatment with a combination of ipilimumab (Yervoy) and coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21; Cavatak) led to durable responses in a number of patients with advanced melanoma, including some whose melanoma had progressed despite prior treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and fewer-than-anticipated adverse events, according to results from a phase Ib clinical trial presented by Curti et al at the 2017 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting (Abstract CT114).

“In recent years, the number of treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma has increased with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab,” said Brendan D. Curti, MD, Director of the Clinical Biotherapy Program and Codirector of the Melanoma Program at the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute of Providence Cancer Center in Portland, Oregon. “However, not all patients respond to these immunotherapeutics, and some who respond go on to have disease progression later. These patients have few treatment options and a poor outlook.”

“We are excited that the ipilimumab/CVA21 combination has yielded responses greater than 6 months for a number of patients, both those whose melanoma has progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and those who have not yet been treated with these immunotherapeutics,” continued Dr. Curti. “Based on these promising preliminary data and the urgent need for new treatments for advanced melanoma patients refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors, we are expanding the trial up to 70 patients.”

CVA21

CVA21 is bioselected, non–genetically altered common cold RNA virus. According to Dr. Curti, it can directly infect many different cancer cells, and as such, it can boost adaptive and innate anticancer immune responses.

Dr. Curti and colleagues are enrolling up to 70 patients with advanced melanoma in the Melanoma Intratumoral Cavatak and Ipilimumab (MITCI) clinical trial. Patients who have or have not received immune checkpoint inhibitors are eligible for the trial. CVA21 is injected directly into melanoma lesions, whereas ipilimumab is infused intravenously.

Study Findings

At data cutoff for this presentation, 25 patients were evaluable for safety and 22 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 50%, with 4 patients having a complete response and 7 patients having a partial response. The median duration of response has not been reached, with a number of responses greater than 6 months and several still ongoing.

Among the 11 patients who had disease progression despite prior treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, 4 had a response. The other 7 patients who had a response had not previously received treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

“The preliminary overall response rate of 50% is very positive, because previous reports indicate an 11% overall response rate for ipilimumab alone and an approximately 28% overall response rate for CVA21 alone,” said Dr. Curti.

Among the 25 patients evaluable for safety, 2 experienced grade 3 or higher ipilimumab-related adverse events. Thus far, there have been no CVA21-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher.

“While still a small data set, we are encouraged by the low frequency of severe adverse events,” said Dr. Curti. “Historically, about 25% of patients treated with ipilimumab have treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events. We have seen this in just 8% of patients treated with the combination, but we will need larger numbers of patients to confirm this finding.” 

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement