Patients With SCLC Face Barriers to Receiving Standard-of-Care Treatment

Key Points

  • Patients who received neither chemotherapy nor radiation therapy had a significantly worse median survival—3.7 months—compared with all other treatment groups.
  • Treatment at a nonacademic center, lack of health insurance, and Medicare/Medicaid coverage were also associated with significantly shorter survival.

Despite decades of clinical research establishing chemotherapy with thoracic radiation as the standard of care for the initial management of nonmetastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a large percentage of U.S. patients do not receive these treatments, and in turn have lower overall survival, according to research from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

The findings, reported by Pezzi et al in JAMA Oncology, also describe obstacles encountered by patients when receiving cancer treatments, such as their insurance status and socioeconomic factors.

Study Details

“For patients who received both chemotherapy and radiation, median survival was 18 months. Among the group of patients who received neither chemotherapy nor radiation, prognosis was dismal, with a median survival of only 3 to 4 months,” explained senior author Stephen G. Chun, MD, Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology at MD Anderson. “In order to improve access to care and address related disparities, it is critical to understand the barriers patients face when getting treated for lung cancer.” 

While patients with Medicare or Medicaid coverage were just as likely to receive chemotherapy as those with private insurance, they were significantly less likely to receive radiation therapy. Being uninsured was associated with a lower likelihood of both chemotherapy and radiation administration, explained first author Todd Pezzi, MD.

For the retrospective, population-based study, the MD Anderson team used the National Cancer Database (NCDB). They identified 70,247 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic or limited-stage SCLC, and evaluated survival and socioeconomic factors to determine obstacles to cancer treatment utilization in the United States.

The patients were 55.3% female and 44.7% male. Initial treatment was 55.5% chemotherapy and radiation, 20.5% chemotherapy alone, 3.5% radiation alone, 20% neither chemotherapy nor radiation, and 0.5% not reported.

Study Findings

Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation had a median survival of 18.2 months. Patients who received either chemotherapy or radiation alone had a median survival of 10.5 and 8.3 months, respectively. Patients who received neither chemotherapy nor radiation therapy had a significantly worse median survival—3.7 months—compared with all other treatment groups.

Multiple socioeconomic factors were highly associated with overall survival. Treatment at a nonacademic center, lack of health insurance, and Medicare/Medicaid coverage were also associated with significantly shorter survival.

“There are targeted access programs that provide competitive reimbursement for the administration of chemotherapy, and our findings suggest that these programs have improved chemotherapy access,” said Dr. Chun. “However, these programs give no financial assistance for radiation therapy, which could, in part, explain why patients with Medicare and Medicaid were less likely to receive radiation.”

One limitation of the study was a small amount of cases with insufficient date or follow-up. The NCDB limits data collected to the first course of treatment and therefore, it is impossible to know if patients eventually received standard-of-care treatment, according to Dr. Chun. Additionally, while chemotherapy and radiation are reported, the NCDB does not provide information on whether they were delivered concurrently or sequentially. 

“Receiving appropriate, evidence-based therapies for limited-stage SCLC is critical, and our findings underscore the need for patients to personally advocate for the standard-of-care treatment for their cancer,” said Dr. Chun.

Additional research is planned to further define population patterns, specific treatment insufficiencies, and the contributing factors to wide-ranging care delivery.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement