Advertisement

Genomic Analyses Highlight Need for Precision Therapies That Target Pediatric Cancers

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Only 45% of the mutated genes driving cancer in children are the same as the genes driving cancer in adults.
  • In addition, the analysis revealed that rather than point mutations in DNA, a majority (62%) of the mutations driving pediatric cancer were copy-number alterations and structural variations.

Researchers have determined that children and adults with cancer often have different mutated genes driving their disease, which suggests they would likely benefit from different therapies. The finding, from a collaborative study led by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and published by Ma et al in Nature, underscores the need to develop precision medicines for pediatric cancer. The paper was published along with a companion study led by scientists at the Hopp Children’s Cancer Center at NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ) and the German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.

The findings from the back-to-back papers provide the most comprehensive analysis yet of the genomic landscape of childhood cancer across multiple subtypes. The results will help guide clinical and laboratory research to improve understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric cancer patients worldwide, including the estimated 15,780 children and adolescents diagnosed annually in the United States.

Method and Findings

Rather than focusing on a single tumor type, the St. Jude–led study evaluated data generated by members of the Therapeutic Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) program. The scientists evaluated six cancer subtypes using three next-generation sequencing approaches.

The researchers compared somatic genetic mutations and their impact on key biologic processes in tumor and normal tissues of 1,699 pediatric cancer patients. The approach, called pan-cancer analysis, revealed that only 45% of the mutated genes driving cancer in children are the same as the genes driving cancer in adults.

“This shows for the first time that pediatric and adult cancers frequently arise from different genes with different mutations,” said corresponding author Jinghui Zhang, PhD, Chair of the St. Jude Department of Computational Biology. “The results really bring home the message that pediatric cancer patients are not small adults and their disease should not be treated as if that were the case,” Dr. Zhang said. “Better treatments and more sensitive diagnostic tests require understanding the biology driving pediatric cancer. These results provide a better roadmap for researchers working in the laboratory and the clinic.”

The analysis included patients enrolled in the clinical trials of the Children’s Oncology Group. The patients had both B-cell and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia, osteosarcoma, Wilms tumor, and neuroblastoma.

Unlike a previously published adult pan-cancer analysis, which focused primarily on coding sequence mutations, the St. Jude team analyzed variations in DNA copies and chromosomal rearrangements. The data were from whole-genome sequencing of the complete DNA of patients’ tumor and normal tissue. Transcriptome sequencing was also performed. The analysis also included the first comprehensive evaluation of quantitative and qualitative expression of mutant vs wild-type alleles in multiple cancer subtypes.

For this study, Dr. Zhang and her colleagues processed the sequencing data using a uniform analytic framework. “Looking across tumor types helps to identify really important mutations in pediatric cancer and understand the pathways involved,” she said.

Genomic Alterations Revealed

For example, the analysis identified unexpected patterns of mutations, or mutational signatures, in 8 of the 689 patients with B-cell ALL. The patients’ DNA had a mutational signature consistent with exposure to ultraviolet light, which was previously observed exclusively in skin cancers. The patients also shared another genomic abnormality—too many or too few chromosomes.

“This finding suggests that exposure to ultraviolet light may be a previously unrecognized environmental factor that increases the risk for developing leukemia in some children,” said coauthor Ludmil Alexandrov, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego.

In addition, the analysis revealed that rather than point mutations in DNA, a majority (62%) of the mutations driving pediatric cancer were copy-number alterations and structural variations. Copy-number alterations leave patients with too many or too few copies of particular genes, and structural variations involve gene rearrangements. “This shows that as genomics moves into the clinic, diagnostic testing for pediatric patients must include copy-number changes and structural variations,” Dr. Zhang said.

Data Being Shared

Dr. Zhang and several other St. Jude scientists are also coauthors of a study led by investigators at the German Cancer Research Center. That study included whole-genome and whole-exome data from 914 pediatric cancer patients with blood cancers and central nervous system cancers, as well as solid tumors. The sequencing data came from the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital—Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project and other sources. The Pediatric Cancer Genome Project, which began in 2010, sequenced the genomes of more than 800 children and adolescents with some of the least-understood and most difficult-to-treat cancers.

Researchers worldwide can explore somatic mutation data used for both pediatric pan-cancer studies through the St. Jude interactive ProteinPaint portal. The information, including the genes, mutations, and cellular pathways underlying a variety of pediatric cancers, is an unmatched resource for pediatric cancer research going forward. The TARGET initiative somatic variants used in the analysis are available at the NCI’s TARGET Data Matrix, and the sequencing data will be available at the NCI’s Genomic Data Commons.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement