Advertisement

BRCA Testing in Medically Underserved Women in Southeastern United States

Advertisement

Key Points

  • 92 women in the study met Medicare criteria for screening, but only 8 of those women underwent the genetic testing within 5 years after their cancer diagnosis.
  • The medical records reviewed indicated that in five states—Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia—no tests were conducted. Dr. Gross cautioned about drawing conclusions from these records because of the small sample size of 92 patients among the 12 states.
  • Testing did increase over the timeline studied. Of the 14 women who qualified between 2000–2004, 0% received testing; of the 40 women who qualified between 2005–2009, 5% received testing; and of the 38 women who qualified between 2010–2014, 15.8% received testing.

 

Medically underserved women in the Southeast region of the United States diagnosed with breast cancer or ovarian cancer may have not received genetic testing that could have helped them and their relatives make important decisions about their health, according to new research from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center. Only 8% of disabled or older women in the Southern Community Cohort Study who qualified for Medicare and met the criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing received it between 2000 and 2014. The findings were published by Gross et al in JAMA.

Women with breast cancer who have pathogenic BRCA mutations are more likely to develop cancer in a second breast and are also at higher risk for ovarian cancer. Women with ovarian cancer are more likely to develop breast cancer if they test positive for the mutations. Their relatives, if they also carry the mutations, are at higher risk for developing cancer as well.

“Women who carry one of these mutations but don’t know their mutation status are not able to take advantage of preventive or early-detection interventions that we have available, so they miss out on the opportunity to reduce their risk for these cancers and potentially reduce their overall mortality,” said Amy Gross, PhD, an epidemiologist with the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research. “They are also not able to inform family members who might be affected.”

Study Methods and Findings

The Southern Community Cohort Study consists of 84,513 participants recruited at community health centers in 12 Southeastern states from 2002 to 2009. The majority of participants—66%—are black. Examining medical records and state cancer registry data from 49,642 female participants, the researchers determined that 2,002 were diagnosed with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or both cancers, and 718 were covered by Medicare when diagnosed.

They then filtered that number to see how many met the eligibility for Medicare coverage of BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, which is largely based on a combination of personal and family history of cancer. The number who met Medicare criteria was 92, but only 8 of those women underwent the genetic testing within 5 years after their cancer diagnosis.

“We were surprised at how low the test rate was, although we didn’t expect it to be very high,” Dr. Gross said.

The medical records reviewed indicated that in five states—Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia—no BRCA1/BRCA2 tests were conducted among the women in the study. Dr. Gross cautioned about drawing conclusions from these records because of the small sample size of 92 patients among the 12 states. However, this cohort did represent a diverse age range.

“Even though this group had Medicare, they are not all over 65,” Dr. Gross said, noting that some of the women qualified for Medicare due to disabilities. “In fact, more than half of them were under 65.”

Medicare significantly broadened the criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 test coverage in December 2006, but no large uptick in testing occurred. However, testing did increase over the timeline studied. Of the 14 women who qualified between 2000 and 2004, 0% received testing; of the 40 women who qualified between 2005 and 2009, 5% received testing; and of the 38 women who qualified between 2010 and 2014, 15.8% received testing.

“This testing rate is lower than what I have seen reported in terms of any other study with the same time and eligibility constraints,” Dr. Gross said.

The low testing rate could be due to several factors, including lack of patient interest and physician recommendations. The review of medical records indicated none of the physicians recorded referrals to genetic counseling.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement

By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.