Higher HER2 Expression Linked to Best Results with T-DM1 in Patients with HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer


Get Permission

A biomarker analysis of the pivotal EMILIA trial suggests that women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer with tumors that have high expression of HER2 derive the most robust benefit from treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1 (also now known as ado-trastuzumab emtansine [Kadcyla]). The study, which was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research,1 also suggests that the presence of PI3 kinase (PIK3CA) mutations in HER2-positive breast tumors does not compromise the effectiveness of T-DM1, but does lead to poorer responses to conventional HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib (Tykerb).

Not a Uniform Disease

“HER2-positive breast cancer is not a uniform disease. Each patient is different. The findings [related to HER2 expression and PIK3CA] are an important step toward identifying the best therapy for individual patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. These data will help us as we identify a panel of molecular features that we can use to make informed treatment decisions,” stated José Baselga, MD, Physician-in-Chief at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

T-DM1 is a novel antibody-drug conjugate with a mechanism of action that differs from that of classical anti-HER2 therapies. The compound attaches the antibody trastuzumab to a toxic chemotherapy called emtansine. Trastuzumab homes in on the HER2 protein in HER2-positive breast cancers and releases emtansine into the tumor cells, thereby killing them. Dr. Baselga pointed out that emtansine is so potent that it cannot be given on its own.

“T-DM1 is 10,000 times more potent than vinorelbine, for example,” he noted.

Study Design

The pivotal phase III EMILIA trial compared the effectiveness of TDM-1 vs lapatinib and capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients previously treated with trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy. In that trial, T-DM1 significantly improved progression-free survival by 35% from a median of 6.4 months with capecitabine plus lapatinib vs 9.6 months for T-DM1 (P < .001). At a median follow-up of 20 months, T-DM1 also improved overall survival by 32%; median overall survival was 30.9 months with T-DM1 vs 25.1 months for capecitabine plus lapatinib.

Tumor samples were collected prospectively from patients enrolled in EMILIA for analysis of EGFR, HER2 mRNA, and PIK3CA. Progression-free and overall survival were analyzed for each biomarker subgroup according to amount of HER2 mRNA expression and PIK3CA mutation frequency. Median HER2 mRNA concentration ratios and PIK3CA mutation frequencies were similar across all treatment arms.

In all biomarker subgroups, T-DM1 achieved superior progression-free and overall survival. However, patients with tumors that expressed high HER2 mRNA levels derived even more benefit from T-DM1 than those with lower levels of expression. In the high expressors, median progression-free survival was 34.1 months on T-DM1 vs 24.8 months on capecitabine/lapatinib.

Patients in the capecitabine/lapatinib arm with PIK3CA mutations had worse outcomes than those with wild-type PIK3CA, but the presence of PIK3CA mutations did not have any effect on progression-free or overall survival in patients treated with T-DM1.

Not Yet Practice-changing

“We had known that PIK3CA mutations downstream from HER2 induce resistance to HER2 therapies that inhibit HER2 signalling. Patients [with these mutations] do worse on lapatinib, but that does not happen with T-DM1…. T-DM1 is PIK3CA mutation-neutral in this regard,” Dr. Baselga said.

“Our results are not practice-changing at this point,” he commented at an official press conference during the AACR meeting. “In HER2-positive breast cancer, we will begin to sequence patients and test for PIK3CA mutations. Compounds that are targeted to PIK3CA could be given to patients with mutations. We need to study the importance of the PIK3CA pathway further. These data will allow us to characterize HER2-positive patients in greater detail.”

T-DM1 is currently being studied earlier in the course of disease as adjuvant therapy and also as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. ■

Disclosure: Dr. Baselga has received honoraria from Roche.

Reference

1. Baselga J, Verma S, Ro J, et al: Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in EMILIA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.  AACR Annual Meeting. Abstract LB-63. Presented April 7, 2013.


Related Articles

SIDEBAR: First Report of Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

In a related presentation at the AACR Annual Meeting,1 the antibody-drug conjugate DMUC5754A showed encouraging activity in women with ovarian cancer, particularly those with platinum-resistant disease, which currently lacks effective treatment options. The first-in-human phase I study included 44...

Expert Point of View: Louis M. Weiner, MD

Commenting on both Dr. Baselga’s study in breast cancer and Dr. Liu’s study in ovarian cancer at the AACR press conference, Louis M. Weiner, MD, Director of the Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, said that antibody-drug conjugates “represent the fulfillment...


Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement