Optimizing Anti-HER2 Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer in 2013 


Get Permission

Fig. 1: Treatment approach for patient presenting with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in 2013. Courtesy of Eric P. Winer, MD.

The good news about HER2-positive breast cancer is that recurrent disease is plummeting, owing to the impact of adjuvant trastuzumab [Herceptin]. Hopefully, first-line metastatic treatment is becoming a thing of the past,” said Harold Burstein, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

Meanwhile, however, clinicians still need to understand the optimal treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, a topic that was addressed by Dr. Burstein and Eric P. Winer, MD, at the 2013 Breast Cancer Symposium in San Francisco.1,2

Dr. Winer is Chief of the Division of Women’s Cancers and the Thompson Senior Investigator for Breast Cancer Research at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. Burstein is Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.

Power of Trastuzumab Underestimated

Dr. Burstein noted that the pivotal trials of trastuzmab for recurrent disease, which showed a 50% reduction in risk, probably underestimated its benefit. The typical Dana-Farber patient is maintained on first-line therapy for close to 9 months, Dr. Burstein said, adding, “This is one of the rare instances in oncology where real-world experience may be superior to clinical trial results.”

Trastuzumab maintains remission longer than do the appropriate agents for other subtypes of breast cancer, and virtually renders the risk of recurrence to zero in subcentimeter tumors, he said. But the use of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting does impact its efficacy in recurrent disease, as median progression-free survival is significantly shorter when patients have previously received the drug. Resistance to trastuzumab, therefore, accentuates the need for new anti-HER2 therapies, he said.

The conclusion from a series of trials pairing trastuzumab with various chemotherapy regimens is that almost any chemotherapy is effective, though to varying degrees, in combination with trastuzumab. “Almost any chemotherapy will work,” Dr. Burstein said.

These studies identified no new toxicity signals and limited clinical impact of “synergy” in laboratory models. Rather than further evaluating chemotherapy/trastuzumab combinations, research should focus on biomarkers and optimization of targeted therapies, he suggested.

New and Improved Anti-HER2 Therapies

Two new antibody products will further enhance anti-HER2 treatment in metastatic patients. In the first-line setting, (Kadcyla, previously known as T-DM1) reduced the risk of progression by 41%, compared to trastuzumab/docetaxel.3 Perhaps more critically, ado-trastuzumab emtansine improved quality of life and reduced symptoms, important outcomes that have been underrecognized, Dr. Burstein said. Currently, the drug is approved for refractory disease, but its use earlier in recurrence is anticipated.

Similarly, first-line treatment with pertuzumab (Perjeta) plus docetaxel, vs docetaxel alone, significantly delayed progression over trastuzumab/docetaxel in the CLEOPATRA trial,4 leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this combination (or pertuzumab with paclitaxel) in the first-line setting.

It is possible that the two newest agents will pack a group punch if used together, a concept being evaluated in the first-line, 1,000-patient MARIANNE trial. Patients are receiving ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus placebo, or trastuzumab plus a taxane.

Anti-HER2 Agents Plus Antiestrogens

In patients who are both HER2-positive and estrogen receptor–positive, the benefit of pairing trastuzumab with endocrine therapy is there, but it is modest, he said. “Collectively, there is a suggestion that you can get a little bit more from endocrine therapy by adding the anti-HER2 drug, but most people don’t see a major clinical impact,” he said.

This was shown in several studies, including TAnDEM, which evaluated anastrozole with and without trastuzumab5; in the study of letrozole plus lapatinib (Tykerb), which led to FDA approval of this combination6; and in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40302, which actually found no statistically significant benefit to adding lapatinib to fulvestrant (Faslodex).7 The findings support the theme that HER2-expressing tumors are somewhat resistant to endocrine-based therapies, though a substantial fraction of patients can benefit from these combinations, he said.

Refractory HER2-Positive Disease

Discussing the treatment of metastatic patients beyond the first line, Dr. Winer said, “The single most important lesson we learned years ago about treating refractory or resistant HER2-positive breast cancer is that anti-HER2 agents continue to work even after progression on trastzumab.” Geyer et al showed this in 2006 by combining lapatinib and capecitabine,8 and Von Minckwitz et al followed in 2009 by demonstrating the value of capecitabine plus trastuzumab.9

Blackwell et al then showed that dual targeting of the HER2 receptor with two biologics, trastuzumab plus lapatinib, could delay progression (with a trend toward a survival benefit) vs lapatinib alone; 28% of refractory patients remained free of progression at 6 months.10 Less is known about the new anti-HER2 agent pertuzumab, but in a small study, the combination of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in refractory disease yielded a 24% response rate, and an additional 26% of patients were stable at 6 months.11,12 He cautioned that this was a small, nonrandomized study.

“These two studies point out,” Dr. Winer said, “that combined targeted therapy can potentially be very effective, and this lesson has played out in the neoadjuvant setting as well…. Dual targeting with trastuzumab/lapatinib or trastuzumab/pertuzumab is a promising approach and may play a role in the refractory metastatic setting.”

With pertuzumab now indicated for first-line treatment, its place in treating refractory disease is less clear. “I suspect this will mean there is less of a role for all biologic combinations in the refractory setting,” he predicted.

New Paradigm

“To some degree, everything changed with the development of [ado-trastuzumab emtansine],” Dr. Winer said. The binding site of the drug (the extracellular domain of HER2) is the same as for trastuzumab, because the drug is trastuzumab packaged as an antibody drug conjugate that delivers high concentrations of the drug to the tumor, sparing surrounding tissues. In the EMILIA trial, median progression-free survival was 9.6 months with ado-trastuzumab emtansine vs 6.4 months with lapatinib/capecitabine (P < .0001) and median overall survival was 30.9 months vs 25.1 months, respectively (P < .001).13

The additional benefit was observed without an increase in toxicity, especially serious adverse events. “For the most part, [ado-trastuzumab emtansine] is an agent that tends to be remarkably well tolerated,” he noted.

Having two new agents has altered the treatment paradigm for refractory HER2-positive disease. Dr. Winer described his preferred approach (Fig. 1). He explained that he selects a taxane plus tratuzumab and pertuzumab in the first-line setting and ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the second-line setting, though depending upon the results of the MARIANNE trial the option of ado-trastuzumab emtansine alone could change, he said. In the third line and beyond, there are more than a half-dozen effective combinations, and the order in which they are best given remains unclear.

“Perhaps we should start with pertuzumab and trastuzumab if the patient has not previously received this combination, and if insurance will pay for it,” he suggested. “There are still clinical trials, because we have by no means answered all the questions.” ■

Disclosure: Drs. Burstein and Winer reported no potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Burstein HJ: Treatment of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer in the first- and second-line settings. 2013 Breast Cancer Symposium. Presented September 9, 2013.

2. Winer EP: Treatment of refractory HER2+ breast cancer: Optimal regimens, brain metastases, and new approaches. 2013 Breast Cancer Symposium. Presented September 9, 2013.

3. Hurvitz SA, Dirix L, Kocsis J, et al: Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:1157-1163, 2013.

4. Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al: Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366:109-119, 2012.

5. Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, et al: Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol 27:5529-5537, 2009.

6. Johnston S, Pippen J Jr, Pivot X, et al: Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5538-5546, 2009.

7. Burstein HJ, Barry WT, Cirrincione C, et al: CALGB 40302: Fulvestrant with or without lapatinib as therapy for hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III study. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Abstract PD05-01. Presented December 11, 2010.

8. Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, et al: Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2733-2743, 2006.

9. von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M, et al: Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: A German Breast Group 26/Breast International Group 03-05 study. J Clin Oncol 27:1999-2006, 2009.

10. Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al: Randomized study of Lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1124-30.

11. Baselga J, Gelmon KA, Verma S, et al: Phase II trial of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy. J Clin Oncol 28:1138-1144, 2010.

12. Cortés J, Fumoleau P, Bianchi GV, et al: Pertuzumab monotherapy after trastuzumab-based treatment and subsequent reintroduction of trastuzumab: Activity and tolerability in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1594-1600, 2012.

13. Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, et al: Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 367:1783-1791, 2012.



Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement