Advertisement

ASTRO: Radiation Therapy Alone vs Chemoradiotherapy for Reducing Dysphagia in Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Of the patients who received radiation therapy alone, 67.9% reported a more favorable dysphagia response vs 73.9% of patients who received chemoradiotherapy (P = .343).
  • Gastrointestinal side effects were reported in the chemoradiotherapy patients, including nausea and vomiting.
  • The results show that some patients with advanced esophageal cancer can be spared the extra toxicity and cost of chemotherapy.

Radiation therapy alone is as effective in decreasing swallowing complications experienced by advanced esophageal cancer patients as radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy, thus allowing patients to forgo chemotherapy, according to research presented at the American Society for Radiation Oncology’s (ASTRO) 56th Annual Meeting (Abstract CT-03).

Study Details

In this international study, researchers assessed the use of palliative chemoradiotherapy to provide relief from dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. The trial evaluated the effectiveness of radiation therapy alone vs chemoradiotherapy through patient-reported questionnaires that measured swallowing ability and quality of life, and through clinician-reported questionnaires that measured potential side effects and adverse events that affected the entire body.

A total of 220 patients were randomly assigned to receive a course of palliative radiation therapy: 115 patients in Australia and New Zealand received 35 Gy in 15 fractions, and 105 patients in Canada and the United Kingdom received 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Of those patients, 109 received only radiation therapy, and 111 received concomitant chemoradiotherapy including cisplatin and fluorouracil.

Dysphagia was measured using the Mellow scoring system, which measures swallowing on a scale of 0 to 5 based on the patient’s ability to swallow liquids or solids. Side effects were measured by clinicians using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v2, and quality of life was evaluated using two patient questionnaires—EORTC QLQ30 and oesophagus module (OES-18). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improved dysphagia as measured at week 9 and maintained until week 13.

Study Findings

Of the patients who received radiation therapy alone, 67.9% reported a more favorable dysphagia response (meaning decreased pain at any point) compared to 73.9% of patients who received chemoradiotherapy and showed a positive dysphagia response (P = .343).

Gastrointestinal side effects were reported in the chemoradiotherapy patients, including nausea (P = .0019) and vomiting (P = .0072). The median survival was 203 days for patients who received radiation therapy alone and 210 days for patients who had chemoradiotherapy, demonstrating comparable survival prognosis for both groups.

“This study was the largest, randomized, phase III trial of advanced esophageal cancer and was a significant undertaking for a ‘palliative care’ trial, namely where the emphasis was on the best, yet simplest and least toxic treatment to alleviate pain,” said lead author Michael Penniment, MBBS, MBA, FRANZCR, Director of Radiation Oncology at Royal Adelaide Hospital in South Australia and the Director of Radiation Oncology at Alan Walker Cancer Care Centre in Darwin, Australia.

“It is common for chemotherapy to be prescribed for patients with advanced esophageal cancer, and this is based on the standard use of chemoradiotherapy in people with less advanced disease. However, some clinicians believe no treatment should be offered, assuming treatment is futile and potentially toxic. These results will allow us to simplify the treatment for patients who cannot be cured but who can expect an improvement in swallowing and quality of life as a result of radiation therapy alone; and these patients can be spared the extra toxicity and cost of chemotherapy.”

The study authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement