Advertisement

Durable Responses at 3-Year Follow-up for CLL Patients Receiving Single-Agent Ibrutinib

Advertisement

Key Points

  • At a median follow-up of 3 years, ibrutinib produced overall response rates of 84% for previously untreated and 90% for relapsed/refractory patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic leukemia.
  • Complete response rates were 23% for previously untreated and 7% for relapsed/refractory patients.
  • Ibrutinib was well tolerated for the extended study, with toxicity diminishing over time for ≥ grade 3 toxicities.

At a median follow-up of 3 years, ibrutinib (Imbruvica) demonstrated continued activity with durable responses that improved in quality with extended treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In addition, grade 3 toxicity and adverse events leading to discontinuation diminished over time. Collectively, the data from the extended follow-up of 132 patients with symptomatic treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) “provide evidence that ibrutinib controls CLL disease manifestations and is well tolerated for an extended period,” Byrd et al reported in Blood.

Single-agent ibrutinib, an orally administered inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy and patients with CLL with del(17p). “As ibrutinib is a continuously administered oral once-daily therapy, data addressing the safety profile of ibrutinib over time, longer-term outcomes for those achieving partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L), and efficacy in patient subgroups become increasingly relevant,” the investigators noted.

Treated Until Progression or Poor Tolerance

The extension study included 31 patients aged 65 years who were symptomatic but treatment-naive and 101 patients who had relapsed/refractory disease. All had completed a minimum of six treatment cycles of ibrutinib and had no evidence of disease progression. The median age of the patients was 68 and 43% were ≥ 70 years old. Most patients (74%) were male.

“Treatment consisted of 420 or 840 mg/day ibrutinib administered orally until progressive disease or poor tolerance,” the investigators stated. The median time on treatment was 30 months (range, 0.3–44) for treatment-naive patients, with 81% of patients remaining on study treatment, and 23 months (range, 0.3–45) for relapsed/refractory patients, with 53% remaining on study treatment. Eighty-one percent of treatment-naive patients and 46% of relapsed/refractory patients received ibrutinib for > 2 years, respectively.

Adverse Events Generally Decreased Over Time

“The primary endpoint of this analysis was safety as assessed by the frequency and severity of grade 3 adverse events,serious [adverse events], and [adverse events] requiring dose reduction or discontinuation,” the authors explained. The most common adverse events observed over 3 years of follow-up were hypertension, which occurred in 23% of treatment-naive and 20% of relapsed/refractory patients, and pneumonia, which occurred in 6% of treatment-naive and 25% of relapsed/refractory patients.

“For grade 3 [adverse events] occurring in 5% of patients during years 1, 2, and 3 on therapy, the frequency of pneumonia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and fatigue generally decreased over time, while the frequency of hypertension and atrial fibrillation appeared constant. Overall, treatment-naive patients generally experienced fewer grade  3 toxicities, particularly infectious and hematologic toxicities, compared with the previously treated cohort,” the investigators wrote.

“Dose reductions due to [adverse events] were reported for 13 patients and occurred primarily during the first year of treatment,” the authors added. “The primary reasons for discontinuing therapy for all patients included disease progression in 22 patients (17%) and [adverse events] in 17 patients (13%).”

Only four adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation “were possibly related to ibrutinib treatment,” the researchers noted, and all were resolved. Overall, discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 8% of patients within the first year, then declined to 4% in the second and 2% in the third year. 

‘Progression Remains Uncommon’

Additional endpoints included were overall response rate, achieved by 84% of previously untreated and 90% of relapsed/refractory patients, and complete response, achieved by 23% of treatment-naive and 7% of relapsed/refractory patients. “Response quality evolves over time, as the median time to [complete response] was 21.2 months (range, 4.6–42.5),” the investigators observed. With extended follow-up, 94% of patients who achieved partial response with lymphocytosis converted to either complete or partial response.

Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were not reached for all patients. At 30 months, the estimated progression-free survival rate was 96% for treatment-refractory CLL/SLL patients and 69% for previously treated patients. The estimated 30-month overall survival rates were 97% for treatment-naive CLL and 79% for previously treated patients.

“Progression remains uncommon, occurring primarily in some patients with relapsed del(17)(p13.1) and/or del(11)(q22.3) disease,” the investigators noted. The 28.1 month progression-free survival observed in the cohort of patients with del(17p) (n = 34), with a median of four prior therapies, “surpasses that observed with any therapy published for this group, including those receiving first-line treatment. Ibrutinib represents a significant advance in the treatment options available for these patients,” the researchers wrote.

“Notably, with 3 years of follow-up, 81% of [treatment-naive] patients continue daily ibrutinib. There have been no further relapses for over 2 years. This gives some suggestion that the best outcomes may be seen when ibrutinib is administered as first-line rather than salvage therapy. However, the low number of genomic high-risk patients in the untreated group prevents firm conclusions on this matter,” the authors stated.

Randomized trials comparing ibrutinib with standard first-line treatments are ongoing. 

John C. Byrd, MD, of The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, is the corresponding author for the Blood study.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement