Advertisement

Palliative Care Offers Greater Cost Savings for Cancer Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Patients from the treatment group on average had a 22% reduction in costs compared to the group that did not receive palliative consultation.
  • Data showed that patients with the highest number of comorbidities had up to a 32% reduction in costs.
  • Patients with multimorbidities account for a high proportion of U.S. health-care spending. They also comprise two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries and account for almost half of the program’s total spending.

Patients with incurable cancer and numerous other serious health conditions who consulted with a palliative care team within 2 days of hospitalization had significant savings in hospital costs, according to a new study led by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Published by May et al in Health Affairs, the study also determined that the higher number of serious coexisting conditions patients had, the greater reduction in direct hospital costs. While previous studies have shown the link between palliative care and lower costs, this is the first study to examine whether the effect of palliative care consultation varies by the number of coexisting chronic conditions.

Study Findings

Researchers compared a treatment group of advanced cancer patients with numerous comorbidities from six hospitals that were seen by a palliative care team with a separate group who received usual care. Findings indicated that patients from the treatment group on average had a 22% reduction in costs compared to the group that did not receive palliative consultation. In addition, data showed that patients with the highest number of comorbidities had up to a 32% reduction in costs. The study’s findings suggest that early palliative consultations with the sickest patients may decrease unwanted aggressive end-of-life care, as well as shorten length of stays in hospital.

“We already know that coordinated, patient-centered palliative care improves care quality, enhances survival, and reduces costs for persons with cancer,” said R. Sean Morrison, MD, Director of the National Palliative Care Research Center and Professor of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and lead author of the study.

“Our latest research now shows the strong association between cost and the number of co-occurring conditions,” he continued. “Among patients with advanced cancer and other serious illnesses, aggressive treatments are often inconsistent with patients’ wishes and are associated with worse quality of life compared to other treatments. It is imperative that policymakers act to expand access to palliative care.”

Impact on Health-Care Spending

Patients with multimorbidities account for a high proportion of U.S. health-care spending. They also comprise two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries and account for almost half of the program’s total spending. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over the next decade, annual Medicare expenditures will increase by 98% and total annual national health spending will grow by 76%, reaching $5.4 trillion. Increasing access to palliative care during hospitalization for patients with advanced cancer and multiple chronic conditions could both improve care and help curb the growth of health-care spending.

“The fact that we found greater cost savings for cancer patients with more comorbidities than for those with fewer comorbidities raises the question of whether similar results would be observed in patients with other serious illnesses and multimorbidity,” said Peter May, MSc, of Trinity College Dublin and a former visiting research fellow in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and coauthor of the study. “Future research is also needed to determine when in the course of illness palliative care is most cost-effective.”

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement