Advertisement

Memorial Sloan Kettering Team Discovery Advances Understanding of Immunotherapy’s Successes—and Its Failures


Advertisement
Get Permission

Timothy Chan, MD, PhD

Jedd Wolchok, MD, PhD

Alexandra Snyder Charen, MD

We are learning that there are few treatments that don’t have some footprint in the cancer genome.

—Timothy Chan, MD, PhD

A collaborative team of leaders in the field of cancer immunology from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has made a key discovery that advances the understanding of why some patients respond to the CTLA-4 blocking antibody ipilimumab ­(Yervoy), an immunotherapy drug, while others do not.

A report published online first in The New England Journal of Medicine1 shows that in patients who respond to ipilimumab, their cancer cells carry a high number of gene mutations—some of which make tumors more visible to the immune system, and therefore easier to fight. The research was led by Vice Chair of Radiation Oncology and cancer genomics researcher Timothy Chan, MD, PhD, oncology fellow Alexandra ­Snyder Charen, MD, and Chief of the Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service and the Lloyd J. Old Chair for Clinical Investigation Jedd Wolchok, MD, PhD.

“We are learning that there are few treatments that don’t have some footprint in the cancer genome,” said Dr. Chan. “For the first time, it might be feasible to develop a reliable diagnostic test to help guide treatment decisions by predicting who will respond.”

Practice-Changing Data

Clinical trials of ipilimumab have produced practice-changing results for many types of cancer. The drug works by blocking a protein called CTLA-4, boosting the body’s natural immune defense against tumors. Normally, CTLA-4 keeps the tumor-fighting activity of the immune system’s T cells in check. In the presence of the drug, T cells are unleashed and their inherent ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells is ­enhanced.

For some patients, the drug shrinks tumors and significantly prolongs lives. Over the past decade, immunotherapy has signaled a scientific game changer. “We’ve spent much time and effort studying how to target the tumor. And we’ve only recently understood how to have the patient’s immune defenses mobilized to treat the tumor. Immunotherapy is by definition how that happens,” said Dr. Wolchok.

But the approach doesn’t help everyone. In fact, about 80% of people with melanoma get little or no benefit from ipilimumab. And thus far, doctors have had no way of predicting which patients are more likely to respond to the drug.

This new study brings the team one step closer to finding an answer. “There was a correlation between having an elevated number of mutations, or more DNA changes in a tumor, and benefitting from the treatment with ipilimu-
mab, with benefit being long-term stability or resolution of metastatic disease,” explained Dr. Snyder Charen.

Study Methodology

The team collected tumor samples from 64 melanoma patients who had been treated with ipilimumab or tremelimumab, an experimental drug that works in a similar way. The tumors were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing, a method that deciphers DNA changes across all parts of the genome that code for protein. About half of the tumors analyzed came from patients for whom the treatment had been successful and the other half from people who derived little or no benefit from it.

“We found that tumors that had responded to the drug had a higher mutational burden, or overall number of DNA changes,” said Dr. Snyder Charen. “But the correlation isn’t perfect. Not all patients with a high mutational burden in their tumors responded to the drug.”

“This made us ask, ‘What is the immune system seeing?’” said Dr. ­Wolchok. “What is it about the mutational landscape of a tumor that helps the immune system recognize and attack it?”

Using sophisticated computational tools, the researchers were able to explore their data through the lens of immunology. They found that drug-responsive tumors share a certain type of mutation that makes cancer cells express new antigens. The collaborative team responsible for these key findings also includes patients.

“These advances would not have been made without the generosity of patients who consented to having their tumor tissue collected and analyzed,” Dr. Snyder Charen concluded. “Dr. Wolchok and his lab members have spent many years banking samples, and it’s an invaluable resource for research.”

Practical Implications

Eventually, these findings could translate into a diagnostic test to detect the mutations in melanoma patients. Results could help doctors and patients make more-informed treatment choices. In addition, the Memorial Sloan Kettering team plans to investigate whether specific tumor mutations influence the effectiveness of other immunotherapy drugs. Dr. Chan says, “If we know a patient won’t respond to ipilimumab, we may be able to identify other drugs that are more likely to be effective against this person’s tumor.” ■

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit www.nejm.org.

Reference

1. Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, et al: Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. November 19, 2014 (early release online).

 


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement