Advertisement


Nick Pavlakis, PhD, MBBS, on Gastroesophageal Cancer: New Findings on the Use of Regorafenib

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Advertisement

Nick Pavlakis, PhD, MBBS, of Australia’s Royal North Shore Hospital, discusses phase III findings from the INTEGRATE IIa study of regorafenib vs placebo in refractory advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The trial provides a platform for the investigation of combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, now underway in the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating regorafenib plus nivolumab compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with this type of cancer who have received two lines of prior therapy (Abstract LBA294).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The INTEGRATE II clinical trial was a randomized double-blind placebo control trial evaluating the effect of Regorafenib versus placebo on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It followed on from the phase two INTEGRATE trial, which demonstrated progression-free survival with Regorafenib. The study was conducted to see if Regorafenib improved overall survival. It enrolled patients who'd failed at least two lines of prior therapy with a platinum and fluoropyrimidine analog necessary who were of fitness, ECOG zero to one and who had advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It was a multi-center international study led by the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials group. The study was conducted over several years and during the conduct of the study, the evolution of new evidence developed in gastric cancer, such as the findings of LONSURF being active in refractory disease and immunotherapy with nivolumab, as well as the promising activity of Regorafenib nivolumab combination called REGONIVO. So we turn the study into a platform study, continued to evaluate Regorafenib placebo and also undertook the INTEGRATE IIb study, which I'll finish on and describe. The study enrolled 251 patients. The statistical plan was to look at the pooled analysis first of the INTEGRATE phase two and phase three, studied together, and then look at INTEGRATE IIa alone. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.7 in favor of Regorafenib in the pooled analysis and 0.68 in favor of Regorafenib in the standalone INTEGRATE IIa study. The value of Regorafenib in improving survival was best seen in the landmark 12 months survival, which was 19% for Regorafenib versus 6% for placebo. Regorafenib was also shown to prolong progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life, all in favor of Regorafenib. The toxicity observed was similar to that previously reported and also within our phase two study and within the spectrum of toxicities previously noted for Regorafenib and there were mostly grade one and two toxicities that were manageable. So in conclusion, the INTEGRATE IIa study demonstrated that Regorafenib in patients refractory to chemotherapy, some of whom have been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and VGF inhibitors, did prolong survival in addition to progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life. The evidence is best observed in terms of patient benefit by the 19% survival finding at one year versus 6% for placebo. So we think this study offers a new option for patients with refractory advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. We also thought it formed a platform for combination therapy and we've taken the REGONIVO combination now into the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating Regorafenib and nivolumab combined in versus chemotherapy in patients who have failed at least two lines of prior chemotherapy. The INTEGRATE II clinical trial was a randomized double-blind placebo control trial evaluating the effect of Regorafenib versus placebo on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It followed on from the phase two INTEGRATE trial, which demonstrated progression-free survival with Regorafenib. The study was conducted to see if Regorafenib improved overall survival. It enrolled patients who'd failed at least two lines of prior therapy with a platinum and fluoropyrimidine analog necessary who were of fitness, ECOG zero to one and who had advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It was a multi-center international study led by the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials group. The study was conducted over several years and during the conduct of the study, the evolution of new evidence developed in gastric cancer, such as the findings of LONSURF being active in refractory disease and immunotherapy with nivolumab, as well as the promising activity of Regorafenib nivolumab combination called REGONIVO. So we turn the study into a platform study, continued to evaluate Regorafenib placebo and also undertook the INTEGRATE IIb study, which I'll finish on and describe. The study enrolled 251 patients. The statistical plan was to look at the pooled analysis first of the INTEGRATE phase two and phase three, studied together, and then look at INTEGRATE IIa alone. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.7 in favor of Regorafenib in the pooled analysis and 0.68 in favor of Regorafenib in the standalone INTEGRATE IIa study. The value of Regorafenib in improving survival was best seen in the landmark 12 months survival, which was 19% for Regorafenib versus 6% for placebo. Regorafenib was also shown to prolong progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life, all in favor of Regorafenib. The toxicity observed was similar to that previously reported and also within our phase two study and within the spectrum of toxicities previously noted for Regorafenib and there were mostly grade one and two toxicities that were manageable. So in conclusion, the INTEGRATE IIa study demonstrated that Regorafenib in patients refractory to chemotherapy, some of whom have been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and VGF inhibitors, did prolong survival in addition to progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life. The evidence is best observed in terms of patient benefit by the 19% survival finding at one year versus 6% for placebo. So we think this study offers a new option for patients with refractory advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. We also thought it formed a platform for combination therapy and we've taken the REGONIVO combination now into the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating Regorafenib and nivolumab combined in versus chemotherapy in patients who have failed at least two lines of prior chemotherapy.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Josep Tabernero, MD, PhD, on Colorectal Cancer: Recent Data on Treatment With Trifluridine and Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab

Josep Tabernero, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, discusses phase III findings from the SUNLIGHT study, which showed that trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab resulted in improved outcomes compared with FTD/TPI alone in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Improvements in survival occurred irrespective of tumor sidedness, RAS mutational status, and receipt of prior bevacizumab. This three-drug regimen may represent a new standard of care for patients whose cancer has progressed after two lines of therapy (Abstract 4).

Hepatobiliary Cancer
Immunotherapy

Richard S. Finn, MD, on HCC: Tislelizumab vs Sorafenib, and Their Impact on Quality of Life

Richard S. Finn, MD, of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, discusses findings from the RATIONALE-301 study, which showed that patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with first-line tislelizumab had better health-related quality-of-life outcomes compared with those treated with sorafenib, particularly in terms of fatigue and physical functioning. These results, along with the effects on overall survival, response rate, and a favorable safety profile, support the benefit of tislelizumab as a potential first-line treatment option in this patient population (Abstract 495).

Pancreatic Cancer

Zev A. Wainberg, MD, on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recent Findings on NALIRIFOX vs Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine

Zev A. Wainberg, MD, of the UCLA School of Medicine, discusses phase III findings from the NAPOLI-3 trial, which showed that first-line NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin) improved overall and progression-free survival compared with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The safety profile of NALIRIFOX was manageable and consistent with the profiles of each agent (Abstract LBA661).

Colorectal Cancer

Julien Taïeb, MD, PhD, on Treating Colorectal Cancer With Trifluridine and Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab

Julien Taïeb, MD, PhD, of Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris-Cité, discusses the clinical implications of new phase III findings from the SUNLIGHT study, which showed that trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab resulted in improved outcomes compared with FTD/TPI alone in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This three-drug regimen may represent a new standard of care for patients whose cancer has progressed despite two lines of therapy (Abstract 4).

Gastroesophageal Cancer
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Immunotherapy

Filippo Pietrantonio, MD, on Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Recent Data on Treatment With Tremelimumab and Durvalumab

Filippo Pietrantonio, MD, of Italy’s Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, discusses phase II results from the INFINITY trial of tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI) resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GAC/GEJAC). These results open the way to investigate nonoperative management in patients with clinical, pathologic, and molecular complete response after T300/D (300 mg of tremelimumab and 1,500 mg every 4 weeks of durvalumab) (Abstract 358).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement