Advertisement

Advanced NSCLC: Adding Canakinumab to First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Tan et al, the phase III CANOPY-1 trial has shown no survival benefits with the addition of canakinumab to first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR or ALK mutations.

As noted by the investigators, canakinumab, a human monoclonal anti–interleukin (IL)-1β antibody, may enhance the activity of PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy via inhibition of protumor inflammation.

Study Details

In the global double-blind trial, 643 patients were randomly assigned between June 2019 and January 2020 to receive canakinumab at 200 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks (n = 320) or placebo (n = 323) in addition to pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 35 doses) and four cycles of a platinum-based doublet. The doublet regimens were either carboplatin at AUC 5 plus paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 for squamous tumors, or carboplatin at AUC 5 or cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 plus pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 for nonsquamous tumors, with maintenance pemetrexed permitted.

Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints of the trial were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival.

Survival Outcomes

At the final cutoff date for progression-free survival analysis, median follow-up was 6.5 months (range = 4.0–10.8 months). Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI = 5.6–7.8 months) in the canakinumab group vs 6.8 months (95% CI = 5.5–6.9 months) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] for canakinumab vs control group = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67–1.09, P = .102).

At the final cutoff date for overall survival analysis, median follow-up was 21.2 months (range = 18.8–25.5 months). Median overall survival was 20.8 months (95% CI = 16.3 months to not estimable) in the canakinumab group vs 20.2 months (95% CI = 16.2–22.4 months) in the control group (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.70–1.10, P = .123). Rates at 12 and 24 months were 66.14% vs 63.47% and 46.01% vs 40.01%, respectively.

Objective response rates were 45.6% (95% CI = 40.1%–51.3%) in the canakinumab group vs 45.5% (95% CI = 40.0%–51.1%) in the control group. Median response duration was 14.3 months (95% CI = 10.40 months to not estimable) vs 13.6 months (95% CI = 10.30 months to not estimable).

Among all patients, higher baseline C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels were associated with poorer progression-free survival and overall survival.

Patients in the canakinumab group had clinically meaningful delays in deterioration of lung cancer symptoms, including chest pain (time to definitive 10-point deterioration [TTDD] = not reached vs 22.1 months), coughing (TTDD = not reached vs 23.1 months), and dyspnea (TTDD = 19.6 vs 11.5 months) on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire lung cancer–specific module (QLQ-LC13).

Adverse Events

Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57.2% of patients in the canakinumab group vs 51.9% of those in the control group; grade 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 3.8% vs 5.0%. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 32.2% vs 26.4% of patients.

Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation related to any drug in 20.3% vs 15.2% of patients, and to discontinuation of canakinumab or placebo in 6.3% vs 4.7%. Irrespective of causality attribution, grade 3 or 4 infection was reported in 15.0% vs 12.4% of patients and grade 5 infection in 5.6% vs 5.3%; grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 24.4% vs 16.8%; and grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase increase was reported in 4.7% vs 3.1%.

The investigators concluded, “The addition of canakinumab to first-line pembrolizumab and chemotherapy did not prolong progression-free survival or overall survival in patients with NSCLC.”

Bruce E. Johnson, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement