Advertisement

Benmelstobart Plus Anlotinib vs Sunitinib as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

In an interim analysis of a Chinese phase III trial (ETER100) reported in The Lancet Oncology, Zhou et al found that the combination of the PD-L1 inhibitor benmelstobart and anlotinib improved progression-free survival vs sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Study Details 

In the multicenter open-label trial, 527 patients (full analysis set) were randomly assigned between August 2020 and February 2023 to receive benmelstobart at 1,200 mg every 3 weeks plus anlotinib at 12 mg once daily for the first 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle (n = 263) or sunitinib at 50 mg once daily for the first 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle (n = 264) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review in the full analysis set.

Key Findings

As of data cutoff for the analysis (end of January 2024), the median follow-up was 22.8 months (interquartile range = 15.2–29.7 months).

In the full analysis set, median progression-free survival was 19.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3–22.8 months) with benmelstobart plus anlotinib vs 9.8 months (95% CI = 8.4–12.4 months) with sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42–0.67, P < .0001); the rates at 12 and 24 months were 65% vs 44% and 42% vs 26%. In the per-protocol set of 254 vs 251 patients who received at least one cycle of protocol treatment, median progression-free survival was 19.0 months (95% CI = 16.5–22.8 months) vs 11.0 months (95% CI = 8.5–13.6 months; HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.43–0.70, P < .0001).

Overall survival data were not mature. The rates at 12 and 24 months were 90% vs 81% and 72% vs 68%.

Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67% of those given benmelstobart plus anlotinib vs 66% of those given sunitinib, most commonly hypertension (34% vs 21%). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 24% vs 16% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation of benmelstobart in 7% of patients, anlotinib in 8%, and sunitinib in 4%. Treatment-related deaths were reported in three patients given benmelstobart plus anlotinib (from cardiorespiratory arrest, unknown reason, and renal failure).

The investigators concluded: “Benmelstobart plus anlotinib improved progression-free survival compared with sunitinib among patients with previously untreated, advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. These findings suggest the potential of benmelstobart plus anlotinib as a treatment option for this population.”

Aiping Zhou, MD, of the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, is the corresponding author of The Lancet Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group and CSCO Clinical Oncology Research Foundation. For full disclosures of all study authors, visit thelancet.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement