Advertisement


Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Resected Melanoma: Biomarkers for and Efficacy of Adjuvant Nivolumab vs Placebo

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses new data showing that patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma who were treated with adjuvant nivolumab had prolonged recurrence-free survival compared with placebo across all biomarker subgroups. The baseline biomarkers most predictive of prolonged recurrence-free survival with nivolumab were high interferon gamma score, high tumor mutational burden, CD8 T-cell infiltration, and low C-reactive protein (Abstract 9504).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Georgina V. Long: Resected Stage 2B and 2C melanoma has a very poor prognosis. In fact, at five years, patients with stage 2C melanoma have a 45% risk of recurrence. And for stage 2B melanoma, 35% risk of recurrence. The survival of this group of patients is worse than that of stage 3A melanoma and the survival of stage 2C melanoma is equivalent to the survival of stage 3B melanoma. This is a poor prognostic group. Checkmate 76K explored adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in resected stage 2B and 2C melanoma in patients who had undergone a wide local excision and a sentinel node biopsy, which was negative. 790 patients were randomized two to one to nivolumab versus placebo. We've already seen the relapse-free survival primary analysis last year, and there was a 58% reduction in the risk of recurrence with adjuvant nivolumab. We are now presenting the exploratory biomarker analysis from this trial. So baseline, primary melanoma tissue, and baseline CRP, serum CRP was correlated with outcome within each arm and versus each arm. And what we found was that for every biomarker subgroup, nivolumab improved the relapse-free survival over placebo. And this included tumor mutation burden, interferon gamma, PD-L1 expression at baseline, CD8 infiltration at baseline, the CRP. So when we compared the prognostic biomarkers overall in the trial, we found that the two factors that were most important for prognosis, so predicting recurrence in the total trial population, that was the CRP and the stage. However, when we did our multivariate model to look at what was predictive of best outcome with adjuvant nivolumab over placebo, we found that the baseline biomarkers that were predictive or most predictive were the interferon gamma at baseline and the tumor mutation burden. Our next steps are to make a multifactorial model, which includes both clinical and tissue biomarkers to predict outcome of patients with resected 2B and 2C melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Lymphoma

Nirav N. Shah, MD, on DLBCL: New Data on Split-Dose R-CHOP for Older Patients

Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, discusses phase II results showing that split-dose R-CHOP offers older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) an equivalent dose intensity as R-CHOP-21 through a fractionated dosing schedule, improving tolerability. At the end of treatment for these older patients, a complete response rate of 71% was comparable to outcomes with R-CHOP in younger patients with the disease (Abstract 7554).

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Jonathan W. Riess, MD, on EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: What’s Next?

Jonathan W. Riess, MD, of the University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, explores the findings of three important clinical trials in lung cancer treatment: whether to incorporate immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment of EGFR-mutated lung cancer, the importance of central nervous system activity in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, and new therapies for disease with EGFR exon 20 insertion.

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Karim Fizazi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Phase III Results on Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide as First-Line Treatment

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, discuss findings from the TALAPRO-2 study, which showed that talazoparib plus enzalutamide improved radiographic progression–free survival over standard-of-care enzalutamide as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and HRR gene alterations. This regimen also delayed the time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life (Abstract 5004).

Gynecologic Cancers

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, and Kathleen N. Moore, MD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Findings on Mirvetuximab Soravtansine vs Chemotherapy

Bobbie J. Rimel, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and Kathleen N. Moore, MD, of the Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, discuss phase III results from the MIRASOL trial, which showed that mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx prolonged overall survival vs investigator’s choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with high folate receptor-alpha expression. The findings suggest a new standard of care for this disease (Abstract LBA5507).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement