At a recent press
conference in Washington, DC, the American Association for Cancer
Research (AACR) assembled luminaries from the cancer research and
care communities to discuss the salient points of the association's
newly released progress report on the current and future state of
cancer research in the United States.1 During the
opening remarks, AACR CEO Margaret Foti, PhD, MD
(hc), noted that although much progress has been made
since the National Cancer Act was signed into law (in 1971), the
past several years of flat funding for the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) may
result in a slowing in the rate of future progress.
Call for a
Renewed Commitment

According to Dr. Foti, a central reason for
developing the AACR Cancer Progress Report is to underscore the
advances in cancer research that have benefitted patients and
highlight the future challenges in cancer research that will
require our nation's policymakers to safeguard vital investments,
such as the cancer research and biomedical science supported by the
NIH and NCI. "Now is not the time to retreat from our mission,
which is to prevent and cure cancer. We are here this afternoon to
call for a renewed commitment to make the eradication of cancer at
the earliest possible time a national priority," said Dr. Foti.
Dr. Foti acknowledged
that the current U.S. economic malaise has had an across-the-board
impact on research funding for cancer. However, policymakers need
to understand that well-spent research funding produces downstream
treatments that ultimately reduce costs. She pointed out that in
2010-due to medical costs, premature deaths, and lost
productivity-the NIH estimated that the total annual costs of
cancer were $263.8 billion. "But as the cancer research
advocate Mary Lasker said, 'if you think research is expensive, try
disease.' That simple phrase sums up why we should invest more in
the research, which is the future of cost-effective health care,"
said Dr. Foti.
The next speaker at the press conference was
James F. Holland, MD, Mount Sinai Medical Center,
who was AACR President in 1971, and was in attendance when
President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act into law.
Dr. Holland gave an impassioned call for more funding, citing a
litany of previous medical advances that have changed humankind for
the better, but would not have been possible without dedicated
scientific research. The AACR progress report urges Congress to
provide a sustained budget increase of at least 5% above the
biomedical inflation rate.
"This year marks the 40th
anniversary of the signing of the National Cancer Act. It was
historic legislation, and dramatic in its consequences because it
focused the country's attention on the vital need to conquer this
disease," said the next speaker, 2009 Nobel Laureate and immediate
AACR Past President Elizabeth H. Blackburn,
PhD.
Dr. Blackburn noted that
many of the advances we have seen over the past 4 decades are due
to research funded by the NIH and NCI. "We are on the cusp of being
able to translate our current findings into therapies that will
dramatically reduce the threat of cancer. But our ability to
exploit these opportunities depends on a renewed commitment by
Congress to provide NIH and NCI with the necessary funds," said Dr.
Blackburn.
Increased
Funding Pays Dividends
Continuing the call to increase
research funding, current AACR PresidentJudy Garber, MD, MPH,
explained that we are in a defining moment in cancer research. "The
value of biomedical research to the economic health and well-being
of the nation cannot be overestimated. Decreased funding can have a
dangerously chilling effect on our ability to recruit bright young
researchers into the field. We cannot afford to lose them," she
warned.
Dr. Garber said that we
are at an inflection point, and it is urgent to increase scientific
momentum. She also stressed that even during an economic downturn,
it makes fiscal sense to spend dollars in biomedical research.
"Scientific innovation not only saves and improves lives, but it
also bolsters our competiveness in a global market and contributes
to a more robust domestic economy by making medical investments in
the future," said Dr. Garber.
Dr. Garber explained that
more than 80% of the NIH budget is competitively awarded to
research grants and institutions across the nation. "According to a
2008 study by Families USA, each dollar of NIH funding generates
more than two times as much revenue in state economic output
through the multiplier effect, adding an influx of jobs and capital
in the communities where the research is conducted," said Dr.
Garber.
A Defining Moment
Anna D. Barker,
PhD, Director of Transformative Healthcare Networks at
Arizona State University and Co-chair of the AACR Progress Report
said that the nation has reached a defining moment in the fight to
conquer cancer. "We now see a future in which every patient with
cancer can actually get his or her tumor sequenced and receive a
therapy for a particular cancer, not every cancer. As we have come
to realize, knowledge of your genome is power. For instance, very
recently scientists used gene sequencing to identify a molecular
defect in melanoma, in a gene we callBRAF," said Dr. Barker.
Dr. Barker said that
theBRAFdefect occurs in about 50% of melanoma patients. "This
discovery is important because with this knowledge we were able to
develop a drug targeting a particular group of patients. Testing in
this cohort recently showed a significant increase in
progression-free survival and actually demonstrated increased
overall survival," commented Dr. Barker.
She added that although
there are other genetically targeted therapies, the impact of this
discovery is game-changing in that the defect is very specific.
"The drug was developed and approved by FDA-simultaneously with the
diagnostics and therapeutics-which really underpins the support for
biomarker and drug development working in parallel. A huge step,"
added Dr. Barker.
Embracing New
Disciplines
To date, more than 290 cancer genes
have been identified, and the list continues to grow as advance
technologies facilitate the generation of complete sequences of DNA
from cancer cells. To ensure that progress does not stall, Dr.
Barker stressed that we need to add more computational science into
the mix, to manage and interpret our massive data sets.
"To capitalize on the
decades of progress that are documented in this report requires
that we bring in new areas of science, especially computational
scientists who can develop original analytical models and tools to
help us convert these data into usable information that will lead
to the discovery of biomarkers and subsequently developed targeted
agents," said Dr. Barker.
"We are entering an era
where cancer research is quickly moving to embrace multiple new
disciplines. The areas that we are looking to now, such as physics,
mathematics, engineering, and integrating new technologies such as
stem cell and nanotechnology will help us change the future of
cancer in ways we can't anticipate today. We are in a defining
moment; it is up to us to seize it," concluded Dr. Barker. ■
Disclosure: Drs. Barker, Blackburn, Foti,
Garber, and Holland reported no potential conflicts of
interest.
Reference
1. American Association
for Cancer Research: AACR Cancer Progress Report 2011: Transforming
Patient Care Through Innovation. Available at www.cancerprogressreport.org.
Accessed October 11, 2011.